|
MEDIA
JOURNALISTS ABOUT JOURNALISM |
Dr. Igor
Yakovenko
|
|
From June 15th till June 18th during the All-Russian media festival
"All Russia - 2004 ", The "Public Expertise"
Institute has conducted the poll among almost 2,000 participants
of the Festival - journalists from the whole Russia.
The journalists from 54 regions of Russia participated in the poll.
Among them 40% were the representatives of the state media, 31%
- of privately owned media, 25% - municipal media, 4% - the staff
of the RUJ (Russian Union of Journalists) regional branches and
officials.
Age structure of respondents:
18 - 24 years old - 11, 2%
25 - 35 - 24%
36 - 50 - 34, 4%
51 - 60 - 25, 6%
older than 60 years - 3, 2%
57, 5% of the poll participants were women, 42, 5% were men. The
majority of respondents (73, 3 %) were the representatives of the
printed media. The electronic media representatives were the minority:
14, 4% are working on the TV, 8, 4% on radio.
The salary of each 4th respondent was less than 5 000 RR (Russian
ruble), 37, 2% of the respondents receive less than 10 000 RR, 15,
1% - up to 15 000 RR, 8, 8% - up to 20 000 RR. 4, 6% of the respondents
receive the salary in amount over than 20 000 RR, 3, 9% - over than
30 000 RR.
RESUME:
1. Opinions of journalists concerning a freedom of speech in Russia
were divided approximately fifty-fifty: half of the respondents
consider that there is a freedom of speech in Russia; half thinks
that there is a lack of speech freedom. Journalists estimate the
condition of a freedom of speech in Russia in general higher, than
in their regions. Concerning the freedom of speech in region there
is a small overweight of negative estimations (53 % of negative
estimations and 45 % of positive), and concerning the freedom of
speech in Russia there are more positive estimations (51, 6 % of
positive estimations and 47,4 % of negative).
2. Journalists from private owned media are more optimistic estimating
the level of the speech freedom in Russia and their own region.
The journalists from the municipal media are the most pessimistic:
| |
Freedom
of speech in Russia
|
Freedom
of speech in the region
|
|
presented
|
absent
|
presented
|
absent
|
| Private owned media |
59,10%
|
40,90%
|
54,60%
|
43,20%
|
| State
media |
47,90%
|
50,00%
|
42,10%
|
56,1
|
| Municipal
media |
48,30%
|
50,70%
|
38,00%
|
62,00%
|
The most pessimistic estimation of the condition of a freedom of
speech in Russia was among journalists younger than 25 years old
and older than 60 years. The most optimists are those from 25 to
35 years old.
| |
18 – 24 years
|
25 – 35 years
|
36 – 50 years
|
50 – 60 years
|
Older
than 60 years
|
| Positive
estimation |
40,60%
|
55,90%
|
54,10%
|
52,10%
|
33,30%
|
| Negative
estimation |
56,30%
|
44,10%
|
44,90%
|
46,60%
|
66,70%
|
3. Journalists working on radio were more optimistic estimating
the level of the speech freedom in Russia, comparing with their
colleagues from TV and printed press:
| |
Freedom
of speech in Russia
|
Freedom
of speech in region
|
| |
present
|
absent
|
present
|
absent
|
| TV |
51,50%
|
48,50%
|
42,40%
|
57,60%
|
| Radio |
61,10%
|
33,30%
|
66,70%
|
33,30%
|
| Printed
media |
52,70%
|
46,30%
|
42,80%
|
57,20%
|
4. Among all forms of censorship, the most typical one for Russian
journalists is the self-censorship:
| Testing
self-censorship |
40%
|
| Testing
censorship from authority |
29,50%
|
| Testing
censorship from media founders |
20,70%
|
| Testing
censorship from the editor |
10,50%
|
| Test
no censorship |
8,80%
|
5. The journalists from private owned media feel themselves most
free. Journalists from municipal media feel the least free.
| |
From
the editor |
From
the founder |
From
authorities |
Testing
self-censorship |
Testing
no censorship |
Hard
to answer |
Have
not answered |
| State |
12,03% |
15,79% |
22,56% |
37,59% |
7,52% |
4,51% |
0,00% |
| Private |
11,34% |
15,46% |
17,53% |
39,18% |
10,31% |
3,09% |
3,09% |
| Municipal |
2,25% |
24,72% |
38,20% |
24,72% |
5,62% |
3,37% |
1,12% |
| Have
not answered |
7,14% |
14,29% |
21,43% |
28,57% |
0,00% |
21,43% |
7,14% |
Young journalists are those who in the greatest degree collide
with censorship from the editor and the media founder:
| |
From
18äî 24 years
|
From
25äî 35 years
|
From
36 äî 50 years
|
From
50 äî 60
years
|
Older
than 60 years
|
Have
not answered
|
| Yes,
from the editor |
18,75%
|
20,59%
|
6,12%
|
4,11%
|
11,11%
|
0,00%
|
| Yes,
from the media founder |
9,38%
|
29,41%
|
22,45%
|
15,07%
|
11,11%
|
40,00%
|
| Yes,
from the authorities |
28,13%
|
27,94%
|
32,65%
|
30,14%
|
0,00%
|
20,00%
|
| Testing
self-censorship |
34,38%
|
29,41%
|
45,92%
|
41,10%
|
55,56%
|
40,00%
|
| Testing
no censorship |
3,13%
|
7,35%
|
9,18%
|
12,33%
|
11,11%
|
0,00%
|
| Hard
to answer |
18,75%
|
2,94%
|
3,06%
|
4,11%
|
11,11%
|
0,00%
|
| Have
not answered |
0,00%
|
0,00%
|
3,06%
|
2,74%
|
0,00%
|
0,00%
|
6. Estimating the activity of the Russian Union of Journalists
(RUJ), the respondents were most critical on its work on solving
the social problems of journalists: the average estimation was 2,
36 on five-point system.
The most positive estimation was on the RUJ activity on carrying
out the creative competitions: the average mark was 3, 92 on five-point
system.
On "three with plus" and "three with minus"
(on five-point system) the journalists have estimated work of the
RUJ on the professional retraining of personnel (3, 16) and the
legal protection of journalists (an average estimation was 2, 83).
The majority of poll participants have named the legal support
as a priority direction of the RUJ work (57,5 %), half of the poll
participants (50,5 %) have named the professional perfection, 41
% - the solving of social problems, 32, 3 % - care on creative growth.
The majority of poll has estimated the condition of the Russian
journalism avoiding extreme estimations: the average value of estimations
of journalism condition at the federal level was 3, 27 on a five-point
scale, the estimation of journalism at the regional level was 2,
93, i.e. the journalists estimate federal media on a professional
level higher, than regional. (We have to remind that 91, 2 % of
poll participants were not Muscovites).
The young journalists estimate the condition of journalism at the
all-Russian level (an average estimation was 3, 5 points) more positively,
and journalists older than 60 years had the average estimation of
2, 8 points. The condition of regional journalism by both young
and experienced journalists was estimated equally low.
8. Half of the Russian journalists had no idols in profession neither
in the past, nor in the present. The most authoritative journalists
for the colleagues are Mr. Parfyonov (13,7 %), Mr. Pozner (13,0
%), Mr. Peskov (9,8 %), Ms. Petrovskaya (3,16 %), Mr. Shuster (2,81
%), Mr. Minkin and Ms. Sorokina (2,46 % each).
9. The journalists estimate the economic conditions of media on
a "three with minus" (on five-point system):
| Average |
51,58%
|
| Bad |
22,81%
|
| Good |
17,19%
|
| Very
good |
3,16%
|
| Very
bad |
2,81%
|
| Have
not answered |
2,46%
|
Also, journalists from private owned media in the average give
twice more often positive estimations to the economic situation
of media, than journalists from the state and municipal media.
| Form of media ownership |
Very
good |
Good |
Average |
Bad |
Very
bad |
Had
not answered |
| State |
1,75% |
13,16% |
57,02% |
22,81% |
4,39% |
0,88% |
| Private owned |
7,95% |
23,86% |
46,59% |
17,05% |
3,41% |
1,14% |
| Municipal |
0,00% |
16,90% |
53,52% |
29,58% |
0,00% |
0,00% |
| Have not answered |
0,00% |
8,33% |
25,00% |
25,00% |
0,00% |
41,67% |
10. The majority of journalists have not found out the trade-union
organization in their media. Those who have appeared to be ready
to estimate their trade unions had twice more negative estimations,
than positive ones.
|